![]() Both had zero CPU design experience, so to have any hope for success it had to be simple. I never had the conversation with Wilson/Furber, but I'm assuming that CISC was essentially off the table in the first place. RISC wasn't even a thing when the 6502 was designed, but in terms of complexity it was definitely at the reduced/simple instruction set end of the spectrum, as evidenced by it's transistor count. It's just such a shame that Acorn didn't have any reach into America and sell it in volume. So many (mainstream) firsts, but just didn't "win" (a bit like a lot of tech today). !Draw was a vector drawing app, that was again, unlike anything on any other machine. The archimedes shipped with !Draw and a few other built in apps. #Sibelius 8 upgrade fullPublished magazines were also full of code (that you had to type in), as well as the beginnings of "free disk on the cover of this magazine". And was leagues ahead of WordPerfect and Word. Impressions was the word processor of choice. The software wasteland as described in the article wasn't as bad as it sounds, there was lots of "home brew" software being distributed via floppy disks in the school playground (no internet kids!), including a hypertext/markup editor (that I can't find the link to) but for static docs, not internet ones. #Sibelius 8 upgrade upgradeWhich lead to the first bunch of viruses.Īn upgrade chip was available a couple of years afterwards (33Mhz IIRC). C was supported.Īpps were a folder containing the code, plus a "magic" file called !Boot, which was scanned and. ![]() It shipped, briefly with Arthur OS (as mentioned in article), and then RiscOS came out which was so much better. #Sibelius 8 upgrade 32 bitThis was the first 32 bit machine widely and cheaply available in the UK. They went from 68k to PowerPC, and from PowerPC to Intel without choosing ARM for the job, even though they were already a huge ARM customer and had already ported their OS.ĭifferent market, different kind of project. Note that Apple was an investor and user in ARM from the very earliest days but only in the last couple of years has seen it wise to put it into that class of machine. It's only in the last few years that we're seeing it in server and workstation class systems. ![]() And then for the nest 30 years it was used in various forms for embedded and portable / low-power systems (apart from the ill-fated Archimedes line which was kind of Atari/Amiga/Mac level competition). The ARM was built by a microcomputer company, for the next generation of their microcomputers. ![]() People who wanted to take a bite out of VAX's lunch (which was big money back then.) I am not sure ARMv1 (and v2) even had supervisor vs user mode, etc.? (It may have, Google isn't helping me here)Įventually the 68k ended up in consumer microcomputers (Amiga, Atari ST, etc.) but it started out in that same market. ![]() As others have pointed out, it supported everything needed for virtual memory (better than the 68k, actually) It was explicitly VAX like - except simplified (apparently 32xx was quite a clean and consistent architecture). The 320xx, like the 68k, was targeting the nascent Unix workstation market and minicomputer-competition. The simplicity you're advocating as successful for ARM was not applicable for the market NSC was attempting to compete in. Entirely different market 320xx vs ARM (at the time and even now). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |